The Prima Materia, a new perspective and the possible link between our universe and the missing universe.

[nav2010]

Alchemy, quantum physics and macro physics all have something in common. In alchemy we have prima materia which seems to be missing on the whole. In macro physics 96% of the universe is missing. The physics of the macro do not add up so they've invented a few tasty terms for it such as dark energy and dark matter. None of which can be seen or measured due to the fact you cannot measure something that's simply missing.
In the world of quantum physics, they're heads are ready to explode because they're now experiencing anti quarks, anti gluons, etc etc and to sum it up they are more confused than alchemists are.
They can quantify most things in the atom but not the electron because it simply goes missing when they look away. The electron can be here, not here and in several locations at the same time depending whether you look or not. This they term superposition.
If 96% of the universe is missing then at some point 100% of it was missing and I can equate this to alchemy. If 96% of the universe is missing then here on earth 96% could be missing too and that could quite well be the prima materia.
Now, Richard Chanfray on a video I posted earlier said that the density differences between his transmuted lead to gold was because matter entered from the 4th dimension. He doesn't know about classical physics because the 4th dimension is actually time but I knew what he meant - the 5th dimension.
So imagine there is a field of anti matter sat right at the side of our own and all matter came from that field initially and all matter would eventually go back there so that you have a beginning and an end, an alpha and an omega.
Now this gets interesting, really interesting. The prima materia is said to be both male and female at the same time, an hermaphrodite often portrayed with a set of wings. What if that hermaphrodite is both matter and anti matter combined? And the electrons, the reason they cannot be quantified is because they switch between the matter and the anti matter in a shared orbit?
That would explain why electrons cannot be quantified and alchemy would then teach the world that the missing 96% of the universe was actually known about before those dummies even put pen to paper and that certain alchemists know where it is and how to get to it. Interesting concept.
Below is a lithium atom and anti atom joined and made one by shared electrons. A perfect marriage.

 

[nav2010]

This would actually imply that during the act of transmutation you cannot look. Because if you look you will quantify which side of the dimension line the electrons will be. Is that why all of Chanfrays transmutations are done in that vessel with a lid on where no one can look?

 

[Pilgrim]

Well now Nav. Let's be real. The act of visually looking at something is surely not going to sway the universe one way or anther. The eyes after all are just receivers of light being given out. So if there is anything at all to the idea/theory that particles can appear or vanish according to what we want or perceive then it's got to be something that happens in the mind, not the eyes . . . imo.

That being the case I doubt that having a lid on a vessel is going to make any difference and that's quite aside from the fact that humans can not perceive electrons visually in the first place.

The human is an electrical being. The two prominent centres of electrical activity are the mind and the heart. This is why there exists the notion of the "Divine Matrix" as some call it and this notion kind of plays to your ideas posted above. It speaks of an invisible matrix that is all arounds us and whice pervades everything but we can't visually see it. The matrix is electrical in its nature, that is to say it responds to charges, +ve and -ve. The believers in the Divine Matrix suggest therefore that to interract with the matrix we must use both the mind and the heart. In the mind you envision clearly the outcome that you desire, that's the "thinking" element that translates into the electrical energy of the mind. In the heart you engender the emotions, feelings of already having that outcome achieved. The heart is where we emote, happiness, sadness, pity, love etc. By expressing in the heart the emotions you would feel if your desired outcome were to happen, you engage the electrical signals from there and this interracts with the matrix also. You can't talk to the matrix any more than you can talk to your kettle. The matrix is not human, doesn't have a voice or ears. It is electrical/magnetic in its nature and thus to interract with it you must use electrical/magnetic forces and that means you must use your mind and heart.
Now all this could be bunkum and nonsense and it's up to individuals to experiment themselves with interraction with the matrix.

However it strikes me that this matrix theory is very akin to your descriptor of the missing part of the universe and the parts we can not see or measure because we don't yet understand it's structure and nature. The thing is, if this divine matrix notion is correct then no part of the universe is missing. It's all there, it's just we humans are not aware of this part of the universe. It can't be seen and probably can't be felt but it could be there and we could learn to interract with it and benefit thereof.

In your atomic model there you've chosen to suggest that for protons and neutrons there is a manifest side of those (which we can measure and determine) and that there is an opposite side that we can't (your anti-lithium) but you've not applied that also to the electrons. Not sure why. Why wouldn't there be anti-electrons just like the protons and neutrons?

You've previously posted on your transmutation ideas where protons/neutrons are donated or grabbed, particularly those of Oxygen and Carbon and you've explained that you don't believe electrons exist at all and that there is just a charged field that balances the charges of the protons/neutrons. Above you seem to have gone back to accepting the existence of electrons.

Just a final thought. If the electrons did orbit in both our perceived dimensions and in the 5th dimension then it would seem logical to me that whilever the electrons were in the latter dimension, the lithium (or other element) form would be constantly changing in some way as we would perceive it. I'm not sure there is evidence of that happening though possibly the electrons are whizzing in and out of the 5th dimension so fast that we can't actually perceive the in and out changes and thus Lithium looks stable to us.

 

[nav2010]

This has massive implications in alchemy.
Chanfray's transmutations are suggesting you are pulling and pushing matter from this side of the dimension divide into the other side by not allowing electrons to quantify. This is exactly what happens in the double slit experiment which has confused science for over 70 years. In the double slit experiment electrons do not become particles until you look, as soon as you look away they become waves.
The hermaphrodite seems to be the act of transmutation.

Well now Nav. Let's be real. The act of visually looking at something is surely not going to sway the universe one way or anther. The eyes after all are just receivers of light being given out. So if there is anything at all to the idea/theory that particles can appear or vanish according to what we want or perceive then it's got to be something that happens in the mind, not the eyes . . . imo.

That being the case I doubt that having a lid on a vessel is going to make any difference and that's quite aside from the fact that humans can not perceive electrons visually in the first place.

The human is an electrical being. The two prominent centres of electrical activity are the mind and the heart. This is why there exists the notion of the "Divine Matrix" as some call it and this notion kind of plays to your ideas posted above. It speaks of an invisible matrix that is all arounds us and whice pervades everything but we can't visually see it. The matrix is electrical in its nature, that is to say it responds to charges, +ve and -ve. The believers in the Divine Matrix suggest therefore that to interract with the matrix we must use both the mind and the heart. In the mind you envision clearly the outcome that you desire, that's the "thinking" element that translates into the electrical energy of the mind. In the heart you engender the emotions, feelings of already having that outcome achieved. The heart is where we emote, happiness, sadness, pity, love etc. By expressing in the heart the emotions you would feel if your desired outcome were to happen, you engage the electrical signals from there and this interracts with the matrix also. You can't talk to the matrix any more than you can talk to your kettle. The matrix is not human, doesn't have a voice or ears. It is electrical/magnetic in its nature and thus to interract with it you must use electrical/magnetic forces and that means you must use your mind and heart.
Now all this could be bunkum and nonsense and it's up to individuals to experiment themselves with interraction with the matrix.

However it strikes me that this matrix theory is very akin to your descriptor of the missing part of the universe and the parts we can not see or measure because we don't yet understand it's structure and nature. The thing is, if this divine matrix notion is correct then no part of the universe is missing. It's all there, it's just we humans are not aware of this part of the universe. It can't be seen and probably can't be felt but it could be there and we could learn to interract with it and benefit thereof.

In your atomic model there you've chosen to suggest that for protons and neutrons there is a manifest side of those (which we can measure and determine) and that there is an opposite side that we can't (your anti-lithium) but you've not applied that also to the electrons. Not sure why. Why wouldn't there be anti-electrons just like the protons and neutrons?

You've previously posted on your transmutation ideas where protons/neutrons are donated or grabbed, particularly those of Oxygen and Carbon and you've explained that you don't believe electrons exist at all and that there is just a charged field that balances the charges of the protons/neutrons. Above you seem to have gone back to accepting the existence of electrons.

Just a final thought. If the electrons did orbit in both our perceived dimensions and in the 5th dimension then it would seem logical to me that whilever the electrons were in the latter dimension, the lithium (or other element) form would be constantly changing in some way as we would perceive it. I'm not sure there is evidence of that happening though possibly the electrons are whizzing in and out of the 5th dimension so fast that we can't actually perceive the in and out changes and thus Lithium looks stable to us.

Hi pilgrim, I suggest you watch this before you comment, it will astound you.

 

[nav2010]

In Chanfray's live Spanish transmutation after he did the French one which was confirmed by the chemists and jewellers present, the lead was tested to make sure it was so, after the transmutation happened it was tested to be gold too. From that experiment we can assume the following..
1.The contents of the bottle were a secret but he agreed it resembled pure water.
2. He said that the black crud on the inside of the vessel had enough power to transmute also.
3. It was the jeweller that dipped the lead in the clear liquid and then the other piece of lead too before it was placed in the vessel.
4. It took 4 minutes.
5. The transmuted metal wire that came out, one was pure gold but the other was gold and partially lead, an incomplete transmutation according to RC (Chamfray).
6. They couldn't understand the density increase because the lead wire that went in was the same size of the gold wire that came out.
7. RC's answer to the above question was that the extra density came from the 4th dimension, it came across. He means the 5th because the 4th is time.
8. RC was insistent many times that the wire be perfectly straight and lie on the bottom of the vessel.
9. RC said on camera that the transmutation wasn't just scientific, human interaction affected the results.
10.In both experiments in France and Spain the vessel lid was kept closed under strict guidance.
If there was projection powder from the French TV transmutation crudded in the vessel, did RC reactivate it with plain water or was that a wet transmutation of a different kind?

 

[nav2010]

Lets just say that the stone is not the hermaphrodite itself and the hermaphrodite is actually the transfer of matter from both sides of the divide after they have become unified with shared electrons or the act of transmutation itself. The reason I say that is because if it were the stone, as soon as matter jumps over to this side it will either be male or female because the divide is a defined border between male and female.
Once you transmute gold for example that gold becomes either male or female. In the act of transmutation the gold is still on both sides and unification takes place.
If you make the stone from both sides of the divide and then it becomes matter on this side it will be either male or female.
This could well be wrong and the stone remains trapped at both sides of the divide but if that is the case, the stone will have an invisible half to it as soon as we look at it on this side and quantify its electrons.
So that is an interesting concept, the stone is only complete when you don't look at it, it can only be hermaphrodite when no one is looking because if you look and you quantify it, it will become male or female again.
We know this can happen with advancements in particle wave duality in modern day science so Its perfectly feasible.

 

[Pilgrim]

Hi pilgrim, I suggest you watch this before you comment, it will astound you.

Nope it doesn't.

The Myth of the ‘Observer Effect’ in Quantum Physics

Why the von Neumann-Wigner interpretation of quantum mechanics is so popular but remains a fringe speculation that almost no physicist supports.

quantumworld.substack.com

 

[nav2010]

The electron orbit on both sides of the divide is already there, matter on this side and the anti matter on the other side are linked already.
If you heat up electrons they enter exited spin states and that could advance the interaction but you cannot look or you will collapse it.
The exited spin state did not melt the lead even though butane was used for 4 minutes, this is practically impossible in scientific experiments so how did that happen? Is transmutation taking place during wave functions rather particle function?

Nope it doesn't.

The Myth of the ‘Observer Effect’ in Quantum Physics

Why the von Neumann-Wigner interpretation of quantum mechanics is so popular but remains a fringe speculation that almost no physicist supports.

quantumworld.substack.com

You are about 20 years late to the party and so are they. Quantum experiments have advanced way past the double slit experiment which
is still unanswered anyway. The link you've put is absolute hogwash used to try and get human beings away from what they are seeing with there own two eyes, The critical fact is that the very act of observing changes the outcome of the experiment and always will do. You've jumped into a lake in which you cannot swim pilgrim and will continually search for ways to discredit either me or anything you don't agree with.
The double slit experiment is now at highly advanced stages well beyond what ANYONE can understand.
Instead of looking at the slits live to see if its a particle function or a wave function, they actually recorded the results and not looked at them for months. They concluded that depending which way they look at the results they can change history of which slit it went through from months earlier. This is called Quantum tunnelling where you can change a past event from a future event.
I've been following this for over 30 years. Learn to swim.

 

[nav2010]

Mainstream doesn't want you to know the truth that nothing exists until you look at it.
They are keeping the results of the Quantum teleportation experiment away from the public too.
Took two atomic particles that were entangled, they can make them or get them out of birds eyes.
Entangled means if you spin one, the other will spin as they are inseparable in charge state. They separated the particles and took one to Sweden and one to England. A green laser was fired into the one in England and it illuminated the one in Sweden green instantaneously.
An Atomic clock couldn't separate the differential either, it was instant at multiples of the speed of light. The entanglement experiments conducted by many years ago. Split the particles and changed the spin state of one particle and the other changed instantly from the other side of the planet at multiples of light speed.
Wiki and google, gets rid of it all but I'm on the mailing lists of many uni's and I get to see tons of stuff before the mainstream destroys it all Berkeley EDU, UCLA, Caltech etc.
Whole world is being lied to.

 

[Lux Natura]

a1

The human is an electrical being. The two prominent centres of electrical activity are the mind and the heart. This is why there exists the notion of the "Divine Matrix" as some call it and this notion kind of plays to your ideas posted above. It speaks of an invisible matrix that is all arounds us and whice pervades everything but we can't visually see it. The matrix is electrical in its nature, that is to say it responds to charges, +ve and -ve. The believers in the Divine Matrix suggest therefore that to interract with the matrix we must use both the mind and the heart. In the mind you envision clearly the outcome that you desire, that's the "thinking" element that translates into the electrical energy of the mind. In the heart you engender the emotions, feelings of already having that outcome achieved. The heart is where we emote, happiness, sadness, pity, love etc. By expressing in the heart the emotions you would feel if your desired outcome were to happen, you engage the electrical signals from there and this interracts with the matrix also. You can't talk to the matrix any more than you can talk to your kettle. The matrix is not human, doesn't have a voice or ears. It is electrical/magnetic in its nature and thus to interract with it you must use electrical/magnetic forces and that means you must use your mind and heart.
Now all this could be bunkum and nonsense and it's up to individuals to experiment themselves with interraction with the matrix.

I have to hand it to you @Pilgrim, this is an excellent way of looking at it. One of the more popular ways it was encoded in the western occult system was with the concept of "love under will". There is this duality of working here, which you speak of as brain/mind and emotion/heart. It is through the unification and working together of the opposites (complementary, oppo-sames, polarities) that interesting things can be achieved when their phases are aligned (as to produce constructive addition, versus destructive interference). That I would call the upper world, there is also one in the lower, which is very much surrounding the reproductive organs, or base of the spine area and navel area. There is a symmetry between the upper and lower worlds as well. Some systems utilize both upper polarities and lower polarities as well, many of which you find in the eastern meditative practices.

In all cases, there are elements of control that is required, in the sense of properly being able to direct the various energies. It's not just a matter of brute intellectual strength either - lots of it has to do with finding ways to release the power that various life traumas hold on us, cleansing the mind and the heart, and so on.

One may call these polarities the archetypal sun and moon, man and woman, and so on.

 

[Pilgrim]

I have to hand it to you @Pilgrim, this is an excellent way of looking at it.

Please understand that none of that is my work or personal belief system. I'm simply relating a theory/ideology that has been written about (there is a book called The Divine Matrix) and there are websites that discuss that book and its theories. I find the concept interesting and it plays to the fairly well established belief of many that good things come from "positive thinking" and bad things from "negative thinking", often referred to as positive mental attitude and so on. Those things seem to support the theory. i.e. if you are exercising a positive mental attitude then in your mind you are envisioning the positive things you want to happen and in your heart you are establishing the feelings and emotions of those desired outcomes. So maybe there is something to the whole divine matrix theory.

 

[Lux Natura]

Sometimes, in the morning, the horses stare into the other field. The grass is greener there, they think. It may be, it may not. They stand and stare. It is them focusing their intentions on what they want. They often vocalize this, point to it, try to communicate it, sometimes in subtle ways, sometimes not so subtle... and then later on I am there fixing the fence.

Either way, in time, I let them into that field. They don't know I have a system of rotation in place for when they can go into that field, but they don't need to know. They have manifested their intentions, at least from their perspective. My perspective is different, and to tell you the truth, if they didn't want to go into that field, I would not even offer it to them. Their intentions do change their realities, even if it is through my actions.

 

[ArgentSeeker]

In Chanfray's live Spanish transmutation after he did the French one which was confirmed by the chemists and jewellers present, the lead was tested to make sure it was so, after the transmutation happened it was tested to be gold too. From that experiment we can assume the following..
1.The contents of the bottle were a secret but he agreed it resembled pure water.
2. He said that the black crud on the inside of the vessel had enough power to transmute also.
3. It was the jeweller that dipped the lead in the clear liquid and then the other piece of lead too before it was placed in the vessel.
4. It took 4 minutes.
5. The transmuted metal wire that came out, one was pure gold but the other was gold and partially lead, an incomplete transmutation according to RC (Chamfray).
6. They couldn't understand the density increase because the lead wire that went in was the same size of the gold wire that came out.
7. RC's answer to the above question was that the extra density came from the 4th dimension, it came across. He means the 5th because the 4th is time.
8. RC was insistent many times that the wire be perfectly straight and lie on the bottom of the vessel.
9. RC said on camera that the transmutation wasn't just scientific, human interaction affected the results.
10.In both experiments in France and Spain the vessel lid was kept closed under strict guidance.
If there was projection powder from the French TV transmutation crudded in the vessel, did RC reactivate it with plain water or was that a wet transmutation of a different kind?

I think there's a non-zero chance that he actually means "time" is being harnessed somehow for the transmutation. People who mess with anti-gravity report time-dilation when they use their machinery/equipment. Also, kozyrev had some assertions that time is actually a flowing, physical medium that affects living things in special ways. Summary below:

Here is the information about Nikolai Kozyrev specifically from the Rex Research archives:

Who Was Nikolai Kozyrev?​

Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev (1908–1983) was a Russian/Soviet astrophysicist who:

• Discovered lunar volcanism (volcanic activity on the Moon)
• Originated the theory of "Causal Mechanics" — an alternative physics framework

Kozyrev's Theory of Time (from Rex Research)​

Core Principle​

Kozyrev believed that "Time is a phenomenon of nature possessing various properties which may be studied in laboratory experiments and astronomical observations."

Key Concepts from Rex Research Archives:​

1. Time Has Physical Density
Kozyrev proposed that time has a variable property that can be called its "density" or "intensity" — similar to how matter has density. This means time can be "thicker" or "thinner" in different locations.

2. Causes and Effects Are Physically Separated
In Kozyrev's view:

• Causes and effects are always separated in space
• Time acts as the connecting medium between them
• The "flow" of time extends from cause to effect

3. Time Can Be Measured and Manipulated
According to Rex Research, Kozyrev's experiments showed:

• Near a cause, time undergoes "thinning" or rarefaction
• Near an effect (energy receiver), time undergoes compaction
• This suggests time is not uniform but can be locally affected

4. The Gyroscope Experiments
Kozyrev famously detected that:

• The weight of a spinning gyroscope changes slightly depending on its angular velocity and direction of rotation
• This effect was small but could not be explained by conventional physics
• He interpreted this as evidence of time's active physical influence on matter

5. Time Flows Differently in Different Systems
Rex Research documents state that:

• When energy transforms from "left" to "right" form, time is reversed
• Time's properties manifest differently in right-oriented vs. left-oriented physical systems
• Through rotation, a body can transform between these coordinate systems

6. Causal Mechanics vs. Classical Mechanics
Kozyrev criticized classical mechanics because:

• In standard physics equations, "the future is not separated from the past"
• This means causes and effects are not properly distinguished
• Classical mechanics gives a deterministic universe but one "deprived of causality"

Additionally, iconography of Saturn shows him as the father of time.






I profess I don't know the significance of such iconography, other than that time itself is perhaps what's being harnessed in these transmutations. I would have to confirm via experiment, however. That kozyrev says time has a special effect on living systems aligns with what the alchemists say in regards to "living" metals.

 

[Lux Natura]

The Saturn of the Romans is an amalgam of the Greek Kronos and Chronus.

Kronos, the son of Uranos and Gaia (heaven/sky and earth, or rather "Air" and "Earth"), who overthrew his father by castrating him with the scythe, and threw his testicles in to the sea, from the foam of which Aphrodite was born (note similarities with Osiris myth, especially the loss of the genitals of Osiris that the fish ate, which Isis replaced with a phallus made of gold, and the lineage of Osiris, who was the son of Nut and Geb, or heaven/sky and earth). Kronos reaped the same as he sowed, i.e., he swallowed his own children, just like Uranos did, and he was overthrown by one of his children (Zeus), just like he overthrew his own father. The birth of Kronos from Uranos and Gaia is also encoded in Genesis, albeit under different terms.

Kronos was strongly tied to the harvest time, i.e. Autumn.

Chronus was one of the personifications for time (as ticking time, ordered time, in comparison to Aion, which was eternal cyclical time), and the Romans amalgamated Kronos and Chronus into one deity. There was already some overlap though for the Greeks though - Chronus was an aspect of Kronos. One needs to understand that even with the polytheistic view points, the tendency towards monotheism or interconnectedness already exist to some degree, thus even Aion was an aspect of Kronos, and depending on the writer, Aion was an aspect of Uranos too.

While one could take the stance that Saturn thus represent the causality within temporal reality, in some traditions it was Chronos who was the source of universal creation - bringing forth the Aether, Chaos, and the hermaphroditic seed or egg, from which sprang the first gods, or the cosmos. Upon some deeper introspection, these two ideas are not dissimilar.

Later on, Kronos / Chronus / Saturn became "father time", and in old age was shown with a crutch, which also later allowed the symbolism to be melded with Roman Vulcan / Greek Hephaestus, who was also lame. We see such depictions in a few alchemical texts as well, where Saturn / Vulcan are represented as a single figure. This father time also became associated with Janus, especially in later Europe.

Within the two facets of time, time as Aion, the eternal, and time as Chronus, the specific, we see a duality expressed, which is not unlike the division of matter and energy, where matter exists as a temporal phenomenon, and energy exists and non-temporal, due to travelling at the speed of light. The formulaic transformation of matter to energy and energy to matter as expressed through the map of special relativity is a thread that connects these two realms, but I believe the stage at which these transformations take place is not so easily locatable - that is, it is neither in the domain of matter or energy where it occurs, but rather that domain which partakes of both of these states.

I think this "partaking of both states" is what is commonly referred to as "living", as dead systems partake solely of the material or temporal realm.

 

[nav2010]

I wrote this thread with the title having the word 'possible' in it. A possibility.
It doesn't include the word 'is' and what you see is me thinking outside the box, trying to promote thought or provoke positive response.
When you get answers which include 'isn't' and 'not' and 'I doubt it' then in as far as alchemy is concerned you start to lose the reason why we are all here.
Classic science has 96% of the universe missing in their calculations. As an alchemist or a believer in alchemy I must concede that we have a similar problem in which we cannot normally see the prima materia and this is a mind exercise to explore the avenue that the two may be linked with emphasis on the word 'may'.
And that the electrons 'may' link the two worlds. Will I explore this idea in the near future? Possibly, if I can think of a practical way to deploy it. Thank you.

 

[nav2010]

Peace 681.

 

[Andro]

Peace 681.

Let There Be Peace On Earth - Red Hymnal #681

 

[nav2010]

Let There Be Peace On Earth - Red Hymnal #681

Shepherdess, no temptation. That Poussin, Teniers hold the key. Peace 681. By the cross and this horse of God. I complete this daemon of the guardian at noon. Blue apples

 

[nav2010]

Now, I'm not happy with classical chemistry's explanation of the equivalent weight principle.
If you take potassium for example, it has an atomic mass of 39.1 amu.
Calcium sat next to it in the periodic table has a mass of 40.08 amu.
Potassium has 19 protons and calcium has 20 protons so they are well matched atomically.
The problems start when you measure density.
Potassium = 856kg/m3
Calcium = 1550kg/m3
Calcium has twice the density of potassium so that one cubic centimetre of calcium weighs almost double of one cubic centimetre of potassium.
In classical chemistry this is not because there are more atoms of calcium per cubic centimetre, its because calcium has an electron valence of two, it takes half as many moles of calcium to provide the same amount of chemical electrical charge as potassium. In other words, its the electrical potential of electrons within atoms that dictates its density on earth according to classical chemistry. I don't believe it and never have.
Part of the reason being is when you jump to gold and it has one electron in its outer valance just like potassium and mercury has two just like calcium but instead of mercury being more dense than gold just like Calcium is more dense than potassium - as per the equivalent weight principle, mercury should be denser than gold but it isn't.
In my opinion one of two things happen.
1. Certain elements affect the gravitational field more than others. or:-
2. Certain mass is residing in another dimension and is missing from this dimension.
You can discount the first. There is no evidence.
Since classical science claims that 96% of the universe's mass is missing, you can bet its got something to do with that.
Mercury has a big chunk of mass missing and the bigger the number of electrons in the outer valance the more mass is missing.
Bismuth has more protons, neutrons and electrons than gold but its density is less than half of gold. The difference is that gold has one electron in the outer valance but bismuth has five.
You could argue that one electron in the outer valance can only be one dimensional like gold but more than one could be two dimensional like bismuth.
So bismuth's missing mass could be the prima materia and potassium’s missing mass could also be prima materia.
In this circumstance, bismuth would be heavier than gold and if you transmuted bismuth to gold there would be in my opinion a left over property.
Lead would also be heavier than gold if you gave it back its missing mass and would also have a left over property.
It would seem that more than one electron in the outer valance presents an opportunity for mass to be in several locations at the same time and there is a finite division between those two locations.
The body of metal is here but the spirit of metal is elsewhere.

 

[nav2010]

If this were the case then only these elements are fully in this dimension and already contain prima materia.
Hydrogen, Lithium, Sodium, Potassium, Rubidium, Caesium and Francium from the hydrogen chain.
Then Chromium, Molybdenum, Ruthenium, Rhodium, Platinum, Copper, Silver and Gold from transition metals.
All other elements wouldn't have the singular valance electron that would allow them to be stable in this dimension.
This means the ones that are here in full would already have the prima materia pulled over and trapped in this dimension. The rest are missing prima materia so it would be an error for me to say bismuth has prima materia on this side of the divide, its on the other.
This explains why copper has twice the density of selenium. All of copper is here including its included prima materia but selenium isn't all here yet, half of it has yet the be born into this world.
The above listed elements would already be hermaphrodites. The rest of the periodic table would be male only.

 

[nav2010]

So if all this were possible, what would be the underlying principle in determining which side of the divide matter exists and how do you bring matter from the other side onto this side?
How do you get access to the prima materia on the other side?
The findings in quantum physics state that the neurological system of a human being is responsible for creating the illusion or the reality which we witness. Without a neurological system, you are left with a wave of probability only or a wave of potential.
The matter which we look at every single day is a result of your own neurological system changing this wave of probability to a particle function, which is classical particle wave duality or superposition which the famous physicist Schroedinger worked on and Albert Einstein called 'spooky action at a distance' to describe quantum entanglement.
This is what could happen:- Bismuth technically should have a density higher than gold, it should be around 20,100kg/m3 but it's 9.78 instead. It's three classical measurements of its nuclear radius do not imply there is much less bismuth atoms per cubic metre than that of gold.
It's simply missing its mass when we measure it.
But....what if the very act of observing or measuring its mass causes that mass to be missing? What if bismuth in an unmeasured state is actually 20,100kg/m3? That is, the very act of quantifying bismuth results in half of it being missing. That would suggest our own reality which is created by our own neurological system can only manifest part of the universe and that manifestation is dependant on the shelf of electron stability of the elements we witness.
I would call this 'the neurological manifestation principle'
That would explain why classical science has calculated that 96% of the known universe is missing. You cannot measure matter which doesn't manifest before your very eyes. It also explains why we cannot see the prima materia.
So...I'm getting back into practical alchemy with a different outlook and a different set of rules. I've got some ideas to materialise things which cannot be seen and keep it here.
Watch this space.

 

[nav2010]

Billy Joel when he wrote the song - river of dreams always stated that the tune came to him in a dream.
He stated that the words in the song, he felt compelled to write them as if they came from somewhere else. This song has alchemical links and the words in the song 'it can only be seen by the eyes of the blind in the middle of the night' has a significant meaning now.

 

[nav2010]

When Richard Chamfray performed the transmutation of lead to gold live on TV, I believe it and everything he does.
Lead when you measure it has a density 11,340kg/m3 but when he places it in the crucible, no one can see it or measure its density.
The very act of not looking or trying to quantify lead allows it to have a higher density than gold. That's why the crucible has a lid.
What we do as human beings is quantify everything around us by looking or measuring it but the problem is human beings cannot see all of the universe, only what our own neurological system will allow.
Chanfray allows a chemist during the video to dip the lead in what appears to be water which Chamfray brought to the experiment. Here lies another big problem. Although it appears to look like water to us, when the lid is closed on the crucible it may no longer be water. Again, once the water is no longer quantified by a human being, it may return to another universal state unquantifiable by our neurological system. It only becomes quantifiable again when it becomes gold with an electron valance of 1.

 

[nav2010]

This implies that 96% of the periodic table is missing and the reason its missing is because our own neurology is incapable of manifesting it or quantifying it. What further implications could this have?
It could mean that there are entities around us made from the missing 96% of the periodic table which we cannot quantify as a human being. It could mean entire alien races could exist in a realm we simply are incapable of quantifying because they are composed of the missing 96% and none of their composition uses the elements contained within our own periodic table.

 

[nav2010]

So I'm going to be transparent in what I do in my next stages of understanding alchemy.
I'm going to attempt to bring the prima materia over to this side but this time there will be a profound difference.
I've bought a 5 stage water purifier and I have my water currently sitting at 0ppm contaminants. I've done this because I don't want contaminants interfering with the results.
Why have I chosen water to begin with?
I have history with it and it consists of two elements in my opinion that are completely different. Hydrogen I believe with its valance electron state of 1 is already an hermaphrodite and cannot be touched. Oxygen in the H2O molecule has a singular O which I believe is not complete and is male. That is because O has a electron valance of 6 which allows it to coexist in two places at the same time.
The density of O here is 1.49kg/m3 but I think its higher in the grander scheme of things and I'm going to try and pull the excess over. But this time, I will not be ever viewing it while the transition takes place. When O gets here in full I believe it will no longer look like O does here on earth. The exact way I'm going to do this I'll explain later.