The Dew is Alive

Lux Natura

Occultum
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Aug 25, 2016
Messages
667
An interesting study was recently published dealing with they types of bacteria found in dew.

You can read the original study here.

The takeaway is that dew contains more "life" per volume than sea water, regular atmospheric air, soil, etc, and it serves as a sort of a natural incubation environment or "birth place / womb" for certain species of bacteria. As the dew descends, and starts to envelop the plants near the surface o the ground, it extracts and dissolves various plant sugars, methanols, amino acids, and other compounds that are naturally secreted by plants. This produces a kind of a supercharged broth.

The most common bacteria in the dew are the Methylobacterium species that can break down methane containing compounds as well as formaldehydes, and in general a host of different compounds that contain carbon. In some cases it seems they break down these compounds in order to remove them from the environment, but not necessarily to harvest energy from them. For example, the breakdown of formaldehydes does not provide the bacteria with usable energy - it expends energy to break this down, likely to remove that toxin from the environment, and while it will break down methane in order to derive energy, and this breakdown of methane will then produce formaldehydes, they prefer more complex sources of carbon (such as sugars, amino acids, etc).

The lifecycle of many of these Methylobacterium species depend on the dew - it's where they experience the highest rates of reproduction. In dryer conditions, these bacteria develop a biofilm layer to protect themselves from desiccation. As the dew forms, they will transfer from the surfaces of plants and the soil into the dew, undergo their replication processes, and when the dew dissipates, they settle again on the plants / environment, and slowly start producing their protective biofilm coatings. These mechanisms whereby these biofilm protective layers are produced react to changes in humidity and light. This biolfilm, also known as extracellular polymeric substances, can also be produced when the bacterial load in the dew gets so high that there is no more easily usable sources of carbon to break down.

Their reproduction rate can be as low as 2 hours in ideal dew conditions, with the most ideal temperature being 27C. 12 doubling cycles in a single day of incubating dew can produce a 4096-fold increase in the amount of bacteria. Multiple days of incubation can lead to a maximized bacterial load and depletion of food sources, and ultimately the start of decaying processes.

For processes that involve capturing dew, carefully allowing it to incubate at low temperatures for extended periods of time, one of the effects of this is the culturing of these Methylobacterium species. Subsequent putrefaction processes likely involve that breakdown and decay of the organic matter / bacterial load in the dew, as the bacteria, once there is no more food source remaining, will either auto-digest, or have a genetic switch activated by bacteriophages that ultimately accomplishes the same thing, and in the process release their inorganic nutrients, such as ammonium, phosphates, and nitrates back into the medium.

Depending on whether or not the flask is hermetically sealed or not, the resultant products will be different. In a sealed flask we end up with methane, organic acids, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and phosphines, and it will have a strong smell. In an open flask we end up with carbon dioxide (partially dissolved, partially off-gassed), sulfates, nitrates, and phosphates, with little to no smell.
 

Kiorionis

Thoth
Magus de Moderatio
Patron of the Arts
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
3,071
And if this were phase one, what does phase two look like?
 

Lux Natura

Occultum
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Aug 25, 2016
Messages
667
And if this were phase one, what does phase two look like?
It depends entirely in what direction one wants to go, but there are easier materials to work with than dew. It takes a while to collect, and "synthetic" dew does not work as well. There is a different way to make the synthetic dew, but the result of what you make may not appear to be "dew" in the traditional sense.

I know of some people who work with dew long term with little to no results - in this they may find something they had missed. For example, the Mutus Liber omits this thing.

There is a Venn diagram that ties together many different processes. The dew method shares in the same result as many of the processes. Some methods are easier and more giving than others. Really all the relevant information has already been given above.
 

Kiorionis

Thoth
Magus de Moderatio
Patron of the Arts
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
3,071

Lux Natura

Occultum
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Aug 25, 2016
Messages
667
Where would one find this Venn diagram?
It would exist in the mind of those who understand the different processes and how they achieve the same thing, often working in different ways. The central key of that diagram would be that matter they work to "unlock" via the different paths.
 

Philosophical

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
300
I appreciate this description and paper. I have also wondered about using dew as a seed culture for fermenting other matters, in lieu of dew I have used saliva as a microbial innocuoant to boost diversity with the idea that it will assist putrefaction, dew would be certainly more diverse, especially spring/autumn dew I would say.

The sealed/unsealed fermentation does produce some very obvious differences, notable in smell and precipitates (occuring concurrently) vs a more mild liquid that is more prone to mold growth on-top. At the moment I find mostly anaerobic but with some level of gas exchange to produce the results I am looking for in putrefaction but there are some experiments I'd love to run, particularly around using microbial innocuoant and how that effects the end result. The avenue of like to explore is if we could fix the stink producing compounds as they're forming microbially the process may be simplified a bit.
 

Lux Natura

Occultum
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Aug 25, 2016
Messages
667
The fixing of the stink producing compounds is that part of putrefaction which leads to the contents turning black. It's not proper to call that "turning black" putrefaction, as it a secondary result after that process. I think most people associate putrefaction with black, as in one causes the other, and associate putrefaction with a rotting or a similar thing. The production of the black though is not from the rotting - the rotting produces one of the two precursors needed for the black. The second precursor is not found in most dews, although in some areas, depending on the environmental sources (and specific types of plants), it could be in the dew. It's easiest to add this from an external source, or use a source that has it already in there.

Thus some matters may never turn black, lacking the second source, no matter how much time or proper temperature you give them. Others will do so naturally very quickly, without much time or fuss needed.

I have not tried saliva, but a few different processes - and ultimately most of them lead down the same path, so it doesn't really matter as far as I can see what the initial microbial source is - random aerial bacteria, yeast, saliva, and so on. Any organic matter I have tried works. I have even found you don't need the microbial source to begin with - their function in the end is mainly to produce that one precursor.

That black is necessary for the formation of the white.

You can also get a white precipitate to form before it turns black, and as far as I have seen this basically ends the process. It is a different white than the white that forms after the black. This is why I think it has been written by many that if you do not see black first, or see white first, you are working in the incorrect way.
 

Seraphim

Rectificando
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 5, 2018
Messages
535
"That black is necessary for the formation of the white.

You can also get a white precipitate to form before it turns black, and as far as I have seen this basically ends the process. It is a different white than the white that forms after the black. This is why I think it has been written by many that if you do not see black first, or see white first, you are working in the incorrect way."

How is the white? before the black different than the white? that forms after the black? Thanks for sharing <3