The amazing devices from the late John Bedini

ghetto alchemist

Hermes Trismegistus
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
1,508
I fell down a bit of a rabbit hole WRT John Bedini recently.
Thought this might be a good place to document and share what I came across.

I first heard of him as a free energy researcher who created what is known as the Bedini wheel.
Just to sum up for anyone who doesn't know, it's a large wheel with multiple magnets around the perimeter and a single coil and electronics at the bottom.
Two circuits are setup, one pulses energy from a battery to make the wheel turn [which runs the battery down] and the other takes energy from the wheel and charges a separate battery.
The batteries have to be periodically swapped out, and the claim is that, against all expectations, there is overunity result because the pulsing battery discharges very slowly and the recharging battery charges very quickly.

Besides the wheel, I also knew that Bedini discovered and patented a way to make a mysterious energy emit from between 2 magnets which improves the taste of beverages and makes CD's sound better. See HERE.

That's what I already knew, but what I only recently found out, was that Bedini's primary area of interest was never free energy, but rather hi-fi electronics.
He ran a company that was well known for producing excellent quality amplifiers for the high end consumer market.
In fact, his amplifiers are highly regarded and sought after within that community [See HERE].
Bedini's company also formally released and sold a device that improved CD's using his discovery, and because it worked so well, it was also well received by that same marketplace.

It turns out to be quite a bizzare thing that this CD improver works at all, but there has never been a good explanation for why.
So far, the best fudged up answer is that the CD's somehow get charged with static or magnetism and the device demagnetises this charge.
Even though the idea is ridiculous, the results speak for themselves so well, that everyone who comes across it just says the same thing that it works and who cares why nor how stupid you look for actually using one [see HERE, HERE and HERE].

The device was copied multiple times by other companies around the world, and is still available today, even on Ebay and Aliexpress.

Well, the rabbit hole still goes deeper than this, because someone at some point even tried the devices on vinyl LP records, and it turns out they even improve the sound on those too.
This was never Bedini's schtick, so there was never a patent for that, but the devices designed for LP's are expensive AF, such as THIS one, THIS one or THIS one.

So at this point, my brain has totally turned to mush, has run out of my ears and is now laying in a pool on the floor....an electromagnetic radiation somehow improves the sound of an optical digital laser system AND an electromagnetic based analogue one.
And even weirder is that the improvements are only temporary and the discs need to be periodically retreated, otherwise the improved effects slowly dissipate again over multiple re-plays.
Furthermore, the fact is so well established that even professional recording studios are known to use this technology when producing commercial CD's.
And not only does the device improve CD's and vinyl records, but also DVD's.

OK, so....I've already actually weighed in on this discovery back when I wrote THIS post.
Just to summarise, at that time I believed that the Bedini wheel magnets must have been doped with HIM particles and that he must have done this accidentally through some unknown process. But I also believed this CD improving device might have been the way to do that doping process.
I also thought that the device was producing a strange radiation beam, and that the improvement in sound was simply through added white noise.

I admit that post hasn't aged well.
Having read so many testimonials, I now realise that just about everything I said about it is wrong.
There's only one thing I said which still stands up.
One of the companies producing a knock-off device clearly explained that ill health effects will be felt if the device is run continiously for too long. It set limits on how many disks to treat in a single session and limits on how long to run the device for.
So the devices probably really are producing a strange radiation beam, but aside from that, you can ignore everything else I said.

I do have a little bit more to say about this, but I'll leave it for now and just let this first post sink in.
 
Last edited:

ghetto alchemist

Hermes Trismegistus
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
1,508
So at this point, my brain has totally turned to mush, has run out of my ears and is now laying in a pool on the floor.
Even though this stuff totally fucks with one's head, I can admit the things must work, it's just that we can't deduce the logical reason as to why.
But I stand apart from many people for taking this stance.
For a sample of how the majority cope with hearing about the effects of these machines, see THIS thread.
But to summarise here, they basically deny all the reports as being the delusions of fools.

I already said many times that HIM is totally invisible to the logical human mind, and this phenomena demonstrates it perfectly.
Of course, we've seen it before, it's the same reaction when proof of the following is presented:
> pyramids delaying/preventing bacterial decay + sharpening razor blades
> eyewitness accounts of alchemical transmutation to gold
> stir-wands improving water/beverages
> miraculous healing from spring water
and many, many more....

It doesn't matter how much scientific proof is presented, it's all rejected/ignored.
If it's never given any air time, then it never happened.
🙈🙉🙊
IMO all of the above anomalous effects [and many others] are caused by the presence of HIM.
In fact, IMO the total rejection of the truth of the reports by the majority of people is proof enough that HIM is behind this.

So....trying to get my head around it, I wrote down all possibilities that might cause it, and could only come up with 3.
I then crossed out the ones that had to be wrong for what we know from the reports and was able to cross out 2, leaving only 1 left.
Here tis:

The glue which holds the 2 magnets together is a HIM containing substance.

Which IMO also means the following must be true:
> The magnets + pulsing coil + HIM substance causes HIM particles to eject in the same manner as radioactive decay releases alpha particles [Eg: they keep ejecting over a long period of time never really running out, perhaps following a half-life formula]
> Strange radiation is simply HIM particles, fired out like little bullets
> The HIM particles get embedded in the surface of vinyl and CD plastic like a bowling ball gets stuck in mud.
> The CD laser displaces them into the air, and they are absorbed into the pickup electronics and improve the signal.
> The record needle absorbs them into it and their presence improves the signal inside the wires of the pickup
> In the Bedini wheel, they are ejected from the magnet glue during interaction between magnetic field and electric coil, then aerolise and migrate into the same coil [probably when it switches off] and the amplify the internal electric current causing the overunity effects

It also means I wasn't too far off when I figured the magnets were accidentally doped by HIM particles.
I just never in my wildest dreams imagined it might have been the glue.

But the biggest WOW for me, is that it can be scaled up and weaponised.
I remember Ken Shoulders said that he worked out how to create a gun which could continually shoot these particles out [he called them EVO's] and that he thought the existance of this kind of weapon was a blight on human civilisation and for that reason he became very obscure in what he would share about his research to prevent anyone from replicating his discovery.

Now we know....make a sandwich with 2 magnets with a HIM substance between the N faces. Wrap it in a coil and apply pemf.
You can use this knowledge to make a simple device and sell for 3K USD, make a wand to improve beverages, add life-force to your alchemical potions, add extra life-force to medicinal concoctions, or make a ray-gun to point at people and make them sick [or worse].
Good thing nobody believes me ;););)
It's just plastic guys....can't possibly be demagnetised....has to be BS....nothing to see here
 
Last edited:

ghetto alchemist

Hermes Trismegistus
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
1,508
I'm surprised to see that this thread had 160 views now, and not a single comment.
I thought that there'd be at least 1 or 2 skeptics who'd challenge it.
Anyway, pressing on....

The glue which holds the 2 magnets together is a HIM containing substance.
I asked google's AI what kind of glue John Bedini was using for his magnets, and it replied that he never said which kind of glue, but it suggested 4 or 5 potential candidates.
I then asked the same question of duckduckgo's AI and it pointed to THIS webpage which specified to use superglue.
That particular article was not written by Bedini, but the author seems confidant enough that IMO he probably replicated the overunity effect.

It does make sense that superglue might be the secret sauce, because IMO it wouldn't be the glue of choice for most people sticking magnets to a Bedini wheel [it certainly wouldn't be what I'd use].
Which in turn would explain why there were so few successful replications.

The question is how and why HIM particles are in superglue.
I suspect free HIM particles must be created during the reaction when the glue sets, since they're ejected out so easily afterwards.
[Eg: other strong HIM substances such as volcanic black sand don't emit strange radiation from EMF because presumably the HIM is tightly bound up inside.]
As to how they get in inside the glue in the first place, I confess that I have no idea.

And of course, if it's true that superglue is the secret sauce, then the next question is whether all superglue contains the same levels of HIM or whether there's variation between different brands/batches.
 
Last edited:

Kiorionis

Thoth
Magus de Moderatio
Patron of the Arts
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
3,071
I'm surprised to see that this thread had 160 views now, and not a single comment.

My guy, I got you.

You like thermochemistry and epoxy resins?






The glue which holds the 2 magnets together is a HIM containing substance.

Two part epoxies generate an internal heat, kinda like sulphuric acid and hydrogen peroxide. But, they eventually cement themselves into a strong glue. Mostly because it binds with a lot of things.. Marine wood epoxy is especially interesting, because during the curing process, it glows a nice and pure green color.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4103.jpeg
    IMG_4103.jpeg
    301 KB · Views: 2

ghetto alchemist

Hermes Trismegistus
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
1,508

ghetto alchemist

Hermes Trismegistus
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
1,508
The glue which holds the 2 magnets together is a HIM containing substance.
OK, I finally found the smoking gun.
There's a document available HERE, where the author talks about his experience with making and using a bedini scalarbeamer.
He described that it gives off an emanation which he can feel in his hands, and that 5 minutes of exposure to the beam causes 1 hour of numbness in his arm.
He also said that a tungsten detector responded to this radiation beam, but did not elaborate on what exactly the detector was.
[We already know about these from Russian research anyway, it's the tungsten filament of a new light bulb which changes resistance after struck with what they called "torsion field"...a rose by any other name...link HERE]

But IMO the pointy bit of the article is that he specifically said:
"I used a thickened cyanoacrylate glue (Krazy, or Super glue),"

And just to play the Devil's advocate, see this video for a researcher who constructed a scalarbeamer and makes no mention of any radiation which causes discomfort [check the comments where he described exactly how he made it and doesn't mention using any glue whatsoever]:

So for me, it's now settled.
The strange radiation is only emitted when cyanoacrylate [aka superglue] glue is used.
 
Last edited:

ghetto alchemist

Hermes Trismegistus
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
1,508
make a sandwich with 2 magnets with a HIM substance between the N faces. Wrap it in a coil and apply pemf.
IMO, you can MAX it out by making a silica gel which is strongly vivified with HIM, then put that between the magnets and use massive PEMF pulses through the coil.

Opps....now I've done it....when thinking about my past posts, I now realise that I've previously told the forum:

> That there is a magical hidden component in spring water [also limestone and volcanic rock/dirt/clay] LINK.

> How to energise that hidden component and absorb it into the body in large amounts, LINK
[and then proved that it works by turning a menopausal woman fertile again after only 4 treatments in as many days LINK]

> How to make a microbial brew which partially digests HIM containing rock, and becomes a health tonic, LINK.

> How EXACTLY to make the gold making philosophers stone, LINK
[and then later provided testimony from a separate source to back up the fact that it would work LINK]

> And, just now, how to weaponise HIM, using the bedini 'scalar beamer', into a ghetto ray gun.
mars-attacks-atomic-ray-gun-with-illuminated-green-mist-laser-blasts-8.jpg
I


AFAIK nobody on the forum, or internet, ever tried to test out or replicate ghetto tech.
But it makes me think...one day someone's gonna be the first to try.....and out of that list, I wonder which one will they do first? :unsure::unsure::unsure:
 
Last edited:

Mahavira

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Apr 4, 2024
Messages
291
The first to try might be Ghetto himself! :)
As always thanks for sharing.
 

Kiorionis

Thoth
Magus de Moderatio
Patron of the Arts
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
3,071

ghetto alchemist

Hermes Trismegistus
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
1,508
Mahavira: As always thanks for sharing.
Thanks brother.
As always, it's my pleasure.
I just came across this device from Infopathy.com
Seems very similar to the device you’re talking about.
While this is certainly the kind of device which I promote, IMO that one is a bit expensive.
For the ghetto solution, just buy the globe like THIS ONE and screw it into an existing bedside lamp.
Much cheaper.
But that device is more in line with healing the body and/or charging water by energising the life-force [aka HIM] inside.

But IMO red-light/IR devices are quite different from the Bedini scalarbeamer on this thread because one heals and one harms.
I see the radiation that comes off as being little bullets containing the high energy of life-force, but when it's fired out in this way it tends to shred our DNA to tiny pieces and cause leukemia, cancer etc.
However, if you fire those same bullets into a water solution containing life-force, IMO those little bullets get absorbed by the water and transfer their energy into it making it very powerful for healing.
It might seem like a contradiction, but we've already seen it before WRT Danae Hardings sparky water device.
Any people near Danae's machine would get very sick, but the water produced by the machine was a profound healing elixir.
In her case, the solution to prevent getting sick, was to shield the device in multiple thick layers of aluminium.
IMO the Bedini scalarbeamer would also require shielding for prolonged operation.

Also....I'm not sure if it's obvious or not, but the bedini scalarbeamer device sends out radiation in 2 opposite directions.
So if you did make a death ray by maxing out the parameters, without shielding, the operator gives himself an equivalent blast by shooting someone else standing in front of him.
 
Last edited:

ArgentSeeker

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 22, 2025
Messages
254
While this is certainly the kind of device which I promote, IMO that one is a bit expensive.
For the ghetto solution, just buy the globe like THIS ONE and screw it into an existing bedside lamp.
Much cheaper.
But that device is more in line with healing the body and/or charging water by energising the life-force [aka HIM] inside.

But IMO red-light/IR devices are quite different from the Bedini scalarbeamer on this thread because one heals and one harms.
I see the radiation that comes off as being little bullets containing the high energy of life-force, but when it's fired out in this way it tends to shred our DNA to tiny pieces and cause leukemia, cancer etc.
However, if you fire those same bullets into a water solution containing life-force, IMO those little bullets get absorbed by the water and transfer their energy into it making it very powerful for healing.
It might seem like a contradiction, but we've already seen it before WRT Danae Hardings sparky water device.
Any people near Danae's machine would get very sick, but the water produced by the machine was a profound healing elixir.
In her case, the solution to prevent getting sick, was to shield the device in multiple thick layers of aluminium.
IMO the Bedini scalarbeamer would also require shielding for prolonged operation.

Also....I'm not sure if it's obvious or not, but the bedini scalarbeamer device sends out radiation in 2 opposite directions.
So if you did make a death ray by maxing out the parameters, without shielding, the operator gives himself an equivalent blast by shooting someone else standing in front of him.
In terms of shielding, the most effective materials are, in order:
1. Lead
2. Steel
3. Water
4. Distance

In terms of absorbing the most radiation, I think you could probably make a device situated in a steel tank of water so that it shields itself while at the same time producing more of your desired end-product. A thin coat of lead on-top of such a container would also produce good results as well. To be honest, aluminum is a bad idea and not sufficient for shielding. Here's a small guide that expands more on the subject:


And a size comparison for the amount of material thickness you need to reduce radiation by 1/10th of its flux/intensity:

1758187421930.png
 

ghetto alchemist

Hermes Trismegistus
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
1,508
In terms of shielding, the most effective materials are, in order:
1. Lead
2. Steel
3. Water
4. Distance

In terms of absorbing the most radiation, I think you could probably make a device situated in a steel tank of water so that it shields itself while at the same time producing more of your desired end-product. A thin coat of lead on-top of such a container would also produce good results as well. To be honest, aluminum is a bad idea and not sufficient for shielding.
I assume that you're talking about alpha, beta and gamma radiation.
IMO the radiation given off from the Bedini scalar beamer is highly likely to be strange radiation, which is a little different.
IMO strange radiation is simply high energy neutron radiation, some people agree, and others think it might be something else entirely.

Anyway, regardless of what exactly it is, strange radiation can definately be shielded.
There's several ways of doing so [the steel and water in your list both work, lead not so good though] but multiple layers of aluminium is definately proven to stop it.

Curiously aluminium is also quite a good shield for neutron radiation, and lead is also known to be a poor shield against the same.
 

ArgentSeeker

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 22, 2025
Messages
254
I assume that you're talking about alpha, beta and gamma radiation.
IMO the radiation given off from the Bedini scalar beamer is highly likely to be strange radiation, which is a little different.
IMO strange radiation is simply high energy neutron radiation, some people agree, and others think it might be something else entirely.

Anyway, regardless of what exactly it is, strange radiation can definately be shielded.
There's several ways of doing so [the steel and water in your list both work, lead not so good though] but multiple layers of aluminium is definately proven to stop it.

Curiously aluminium is also quite a good shield for neutron radiation, and lead is also known to be a poor shield against the same.
I can get on-board with that, but then the question remains as to why? So what property of aluminum is acting as a shield for the SR? Is it foil, aluminum plate, does it have gaps of air between layers? It may be that if you figure out the why of aluminum being a better shield for SR, you might find out a bit more about the properties of SR itself. Maybe it's the reflectivity?
 
Last edited:

ghetto alchemist

Hermes Trismegistus
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
1,508
the question remains as to why? So what property of aluminum is acting as a shield for the SR?
I already said that IMO strange radiation is simply neutron radiation.
So just look it up on google as to why exactly aluminium is so good at absorbing neutrons. I’m sure there’ll be a page on Wikipedia talking about it.
UPDATE I asked Google's AI, and this was it's answer:
Aluminum absorbs neutrons through the process of neutron capture, specifically the 27Al(n,γ)28Al reaction, where an aluminum-27 nucleus captures a neutron and forms the radioisotope aluminum-28. This capture event is characterized by a neutron capture cross-section, a measure of the likelihood of a neutron being absorbed by a nucleus, which is a property of the specific atom and neutron energy.
Here's a breakdown of why aluminum does this:

  • Neutron Capture:The most common reaction is the capture of a neutron by an aluminum-27 nucleus, forming aluminum-28.
  • Nuclear Cross-Section:The tendency for an atom to absorb a neutron is determined by its neutron capture cross-section. Aluminum has a specific cross-section, and neutrons with energies matching resonance energies are particularly likely to be captured, leading to resonance capture.
  • Neutron Activation:When a neutron is captured by aluminum, it becomes radioactive through a process called neutron activation, resulting in the formation of aluminum-28, which has a short half-life.
  • Gamma Ray Emission:The newly formed radioactive aluminum nucleus then undergoes beta decay, emitting gamma rays as it transitions to a more stable state.

Is it foil, aluminum plate, does it have gaps of air between layers? It may be that if you figure out the why of aluminum being a better shield for SR, you might find out a bit more about the properties of SR itself. Maybe it's the reflectivity?
Yep, all of those work. If using foil, then you just need a lot more layers.
And put wax paper or polyethylene sheets between each layer to improve.
From memory I think Danae Harding used 2 fairly thick layers with water between them, but i’d have to check my notes to be sure.
UPDATE: I just went to the source pages HERE and HERE [I recommend taking a read of them] and it only says layers of 1/8" aluminium

What’s known to be a good absorber and way to detect/measure the radiation particles is blank DVD’s stacked together and turned sideways. The particles get absorbed and form scratches on the surface, which can then be viewed under a microscope. In fact if anyone ends up making one of these devices, then I recommend doing this just to prove the radiation produced by this device is a real thing. The LENR community might even be excited to know about an easy way to produce SR, just for the sake of doing further research on it.
 
Last edited:

ArgentSeeker

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 22, 2025
Messages
254
I already said that IMO strange radiation is simply neutron radiation.
So just look it up on google as to why exactly aluminium is so good at absorbing neutrons. I’m sure there’ll be a page on Wikipedia talking about it.
UPDATE I asked Google's AI, and this was it's answer:



Yep, all of those work. If using foil, then you just need a lot more layers.
And put wax paper or polyethylene sheets between each layer to improve.
From memory I think Danae Harding used 2 fairly thick layers with water between them, but i’d have to check my notes to be sure.
UPDATE: I just went to the source pages HERE and HERE [I recommend taking a read of them] and it only says layers of 1/8" aluminium

What’s known to be a good absorber and way to detect/measure the radiation particles is blank DVD’s stacked together and turned sideways. The particles get absorbed and form scratches on the surface, which can then be viewed under a microscope. In fact if anyone ends up making one of these devices, then I recommend doing this just to prove the radiation produced by this device is a real thing. The LENR community might even be excited to know about an easy way to produce SR, just for the sake of doing further research on it.
I don't think it's neutron radiation, or at least it's not the traditional type. Yes, aluminum can absorb neutrons, but it's really not much better than lead in terms of absorption cross-section (larger cross-section essentially means bigger target -> higher probability of absorbing neutrons). From Grok:
Neutron Capture Cross-Sections
  • Lead (Pb): The thermal neutron capture cross-section for natural lead is approximately 0.17 barns (averaged across its isotopes, primarily Pb-206, Pb-207, and Pb-208). Lead has a low capture cross-section, making it relatively transparent to neutrons.
  • Aluminum (Al): The thermal neutron capture cross-section for aluminum-27 (the primary isotope) is about 0.23 barns. Aluminum also has a relatively low capture cross-section, though slightly higher than lead.
Efficiency Comparison
  • Aluminum is slightly more efficient at capturing thermal neutrons than lead due to its higher capture cross-section (0.23 barns vs. 0.17 barns). However, both materials are considered poor neutron absorbers compared to materials like boron (B-10: 3840 barns) or cadmium (2520 barns).
  • For fast neutrons, capture cross-sections are generally much lower for both materials (on the order of millibarns), and scattering dominates over capture. Neither lead nor aluminum is particularly effective at capturing fast neutrons.
Practical Implications
  • Lead: Often used in radiation shielding for gamma rays due to its high density and atomic number, but its low neutron capture cross-section makes it ineffective for neutron absorption. Neutrons pass through lead with minimal capture, though some scattering occurs.
  • Aluminum: Also a poor neutron absorber but slightly better than lead for thermal neutrons. Aluminum is often used in nuclear applications (e.g., reactor components) due to its low neutron capture and good structural properties, minimizing unwanted neutron absorption that could produce radioactive isotopes.
Contextual Considerations
  • Neutron Energy: The capture efficiency depends heavily on neutron energy. For thermal neutrons, aluminum captures slightly more neutrons than lead. For fast neutrons, both have negligible capture efficiency.
  • Activation: Both materials can become radioactive upon neutron capture (e.g., Al-27 forms Al-28, which decays quickly; lead isotopes form heavier isotopes with varying decay properties). Aluminum’s shorter-lived activation products may be preferable in some applications.
  • Shielding Design: Neither material is ideal for neutron capture. Effective neutron shielding typically involves materials with high capture cross-sections (e.g., boron, cadmium) or moderators (e.g., water, paraffin) to slow fast neutrons before capture.
Conclusion: Aluminum is slightly more efficient than lead at capturing thermal neutrons (0.23 barns vs. 0.17 barns), but both are poor neutron absorbers compared to specialized materials. For practical neutron capture applications, materials like boron or cadmium are far superior. If you need shielding, lead is better for gamma rays, while neutron-specific materials should be paired with it for comprehensive protection. If you have a specific neutron energy range or application in mind, let me know, and I can refine the comparison!

So Neutron radiation probably isn't it. Now, point of contention is that the Russian experiments with Kozyrov Mirrors also used Aluminum plated/plate high polish mirrors as the basis for their experiment. Let me get the documentary and some pdfs I just pulled up. This conversation jogged my memory. Ironically, they use the big "A/E" word, your HIM, when they describe the information field that the mirrors supposedly allow the scientists to access.


Now, interestingly, in this documentary they talk about concave mirrors. I recall there being some similar scuttlebut written about RC methods of collecting a white powder from the surface of concave mirrors, which had interesting effects on the metals. Maybe a secret of those mirrors was they they were aluminum instead of silver?
 

Attachments

  • kozyrev-aether-time-and-torsion_compress.pdf
    223.9 KB · Views: 3
  • drawings-kozyrev-mirrors-kozyrev-mirrors-with-your-own-hands_compress.pdf
    442.1 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:

Kiorionis

Thoth
Magus de Moderatio
Patron of the Arts
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
3,071
I don't think it's neutron radiation, or at least it's not the traditional type.

Isn’t there a sort of right-spin and left-spin to that sort of thing?
 

ArgentSeeker

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 22, 2025
Messages
254
Isn’t there a sort of right-spin and left-spin to that sort of thing?
I never encountered that topic much in my training, but supposedly neutrons have spin which makes them "magnetic" and it is electrons that are usually designated as having left or right hand spin. HOWEVER, looking at Dion Fortune, she also discusses twirling in clockwise direction, or performing certain rituals in the the clockwise direction, as methods of protection. It is asserted to NEVER do so in the counter-clockwise direction. Extrapolating that from what I've been reading about lately, it seems to me that CW is unity/yang/fusion, while CCW is separation/yin/fission. Something to consider.
 

Mahavira

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Apr 4, 2024
Messages
291
Not to deviate too much from the thread topic, I will nonetheless say that pure aluminium as is commonly used on youtube for Kozyrev mirrors is the budget version it seems. Aluminium alloy is mentioned in these documents linked above by ArgentSeeker but without further specifications.

Though I've not verified the info, I've heard the original mirrors were made from mu-metal (thus very expensive) which makes sense if the goal is to create a shielded space from all kinds of radiations and fields in order to tap into the Aether.
 

ArgentSeeker

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 22, 2025
Messages
254
Not to deviate too much from the thread topic, I will nonetheless say that pure aluminium as is commonly used on youtube for Kozyrev mirrors is the budget version it seems. Aluminium alloy is mentioned in these documents linked above by ArgentSeeker but without further specifications.

Though I've not verified the info, I've heard the original mirrors were made from mu-metal (thus very expensive) which makes sense if the goal is to create a shielded space from all kinds of radiations and fields in order to tap into the Aether.
Well, here's a book with the patents and build specs:

Here's a choice passage:

For many years N.A. Kozyrev has conducted observations using a telescope. He mounted a thin thread of a thermistor at the telescope's focus, and the thermistor sensed the spatial-temporal flows, the energetic flows of time emitted by the stars. N.A. Kozyrev conducted this experiment many times and he has found that the position of a star, which is really existing in the present time, causes excitation, gives an energy stimulus to the crystalline structure of the resistor which serves to register changes in electric conductivity and, conditionally, its temperature (the question is not in temperature changes, but in the electric conductivity of the crystal). When the telescope is focused on the light spot of a star, after aberration correction, it may appear that the resistor indicates the energetic flow of time. Moreover, even in the case when the telescope is focused at the spot where the star will move through the sky in due time, the resistor records the energetic flow of time.

The velocity of the time flow exceeds that of light rays, and may also combine with the flow of light similar to the situation when the signal is registered together with the visible light radiation of the star. Both these flows bear some information. The essence of this information is another question since it reflects some as yet unknown component of Life, some component of the interactions of our Universe in all its forms. It is very important that the scientist has recorded similar fluctuations during solar and lunar eclipses, during sunrises and sunsets, as well as during moonrises and moonsets, in springtime during the florescence and growth of plants, during ordinary experiments with rotating instruments, evaporation of gases, sugar dilution, snow melting, etc.

Celestial agriculture indeed.

One more:

In the popular tellings of his theories that you might find on YouTube, Kozyrev’s theories are almost always misrepresented as “time = light” or similar. In fact, when looked at with a modern lens, Kozyrev’s proposed “time energy” is more similar to what we think of as “zero point” or “physical vacuum” energy. He essentially suggests that time energy is everywhere in the universe, and all physical matter is constantly interacting with each other in flows of energy. Think of sponges under water — they’re soaking but water is constantly flowing in and out of them. You can squeeze them to remove water temporarily, but once you let go, they return to an equilibrium of saturation. For Kozyrev, this type of energy is in everything, everywhere, all at once. Any change in time appears instantaneously in all the time energy, and thus non-local interactions were possible without violating relativity, because no matter is moving at superluminal speeds. Time energy does, however, have properties like other types of energy — it can be sped up and slowed down; it has density; it can be reflected. The main effect of time energy is negentropic; that is to say, it counteracts entropy and stops material bodies from disintegrating into their constituent parts.
Kozyrev says time energy. Quantum physicists say zero point. Bearden calls it longitudinal/scalar waves. Tesla called it aether. Reich called it orgone. Ghetto calls it HIM. Philosophers call it SM.

What is it?
 
Last edited:

ArgentSeeker

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 22, 2025
Messages
254
Also, good ol' rex research has our answer on construction and alloy materials:
[0010] The aluminum/magnesium metal shielding device according to the invention is comprised of an aluminum/magnesium alloy preferably further containing silicon. Preferred metal shields contain 80-98%, preferably 90-95%, aluminum, 2-20%, preferably 3-7%, magnesium and 0-2%, preferably 1-1.5% silicon. It has, furthermore, been shown according to the invention that the effects of the invention cannot be achieved by means of a metal shielding device made of pure aluminum.

[0011] The hypomagnetic chamber according to the invention likewise must be comprised of a special material which ensures the effects according to the invention to occur, that is to say of Permalloy steel or a Permalloy alloy. By Permalloy alloys or steels, Fe-Ni-based magnetic materials containing 72-83% Ni portions and preferably Mo, Cu and Cr as additives are generally understood. The materials according to the invention have comparatively high permeability values ranging between 30,000 and 150,000, a low magnetic power loss during magnetic reversal, and rectangular hysteresis loops (cf. Lueger, Lexikon der Technik, Vol. 16, "Magnetische Werkstoffe; in particular, point 5.1.2.2.). According to the invention, the final magnetic field through the chamber is attenuated to preferably {fraction (1/600)}, in particular {fraction (1/5000)}, attenuation being a function also of the chamber size.

So, there's an external chamber made of shielding steel, with the mirror/device being inside the shield being made of an aluminum alloy comprised of aluminum, magnesium, and silicon.
 
Last edited:

Kiorionis

Thoth
Magus de Moderatio
Patron of the Arts
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
3,071
But IMO red-light/IR devices are quite different from the Bedini scalarbeamer on this thread because one heals and one harms.
I see the radiation that comes off as being little bullets containing the high energy of life-force, but when it's fired out in this way it tends to shred our DNA to tiny pieces and cause leukemia, cancer etc

I see radiation as a the stone which caused the ripple on the still pool of water. Except the stone is floating on the surface and the ripples are perpetual, and the whole this is the water as well, a field of vibration extending out from the center, rather than some bullet or something which is sent out and never comes back.

Very interesting stuff though, @ghetto alchemist I enjoy reading your posts and seeing what connections you’re making.

To be honest, aluminum is a bad idea and not sufficient for shielding
Aluminum is a good shield for less volatile frequencies though, like radio waves and the like, and a good material for a faraday cage.
 

ArgentSeeker

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 22, 2025
Messages
254
I see radiation as a the stone which caused the ripple on the still pool of water. Except the stone is floating on the surface and the ripples are perpetual, and the whole this is the water as well, a field of vibration extending out from the center, rather than some bullet or something which is sent out and never comes back.

Very interesting stuff though, @ghetto alchemist I enjoy reading your posts and seeing what connections you’re making.


Aluminum is a good shield for less volatile frequencies though, like radio waves and the like, and a good material for a faraday cage.
I stand corrected about aluminum being not so great for shielding. I wonder if the joe-cell material is made with the same alloy? I feel like it can be used to concentrate via reflection, rather than shield by absorption, the SR of Mr. Ghetto. Something to investigate.
 

Kiorionis

Thoth
Magus de Moderatio
Patron of the Arts
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
3,071
the interesting thing about aluminum is that if it’s not grounded, it’ll just be charged by certain frequencies and the radiate those outward. If there’s a path to ground though, like in any faraday cage, then those frequencies are grounded.

I think neutrons and frequencies similar easily pass through aluminum though.
 

ghetto alchemist

Hermes Trismegistus
Honorable Meister
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
1,508
So for me, it's now settled.
The strange radiation is only emitted when cyanoacrylate [aka superglue] glue is used.
And of course, if it's true that superglue is the secret sauce, then the next question is whether all superglue contains the same levels of HIM or whether there's variation between different brands/batches.
OK, so I just made my own scalarbeamer using 2 ferrite rectangle magnets.
I used cheap-ass dollar-store superglue, 25 coils and pulsed it with my PEMF power supply [which is quite powerful at 150 Watts].
Didn't get the radiation at all.
So, no, cyanoacrylate on it's own is not the secret sauce after all.

I came back to this thread and re-read this:
I used a thickened cyanoacrylate glue [LINK]
It looks like the thickening agent must be the source of the magic.
Just did a quick google search to find out what agent is used to thicken CA glue, the answer is "fumed silica" [LINK]

IMO, you can MAX it out by making a silica gel which is strongly vivified with HIM, then put that between the magnets
FIGJAM
41qwGZTo6mL._SY445_SX342_.jpg