- Joined
- Apr 26, 2023
- Messages
- 1,255
I read the following today which explains why secrecy is/was necessary for those who have the Stone:
If this secret is a gift of God, some will say it must doubtless be placed in the category of the talents
which God bestows and which must not be buried. If Philosophers are people so pious, so charitable,
why do we see so few good works on their part? A single one, Nicolas Flamel, in France, has built
and endowed churches and hospitals. These monuments exist today in the sight of all Paris. If there
are other Philosophers, why do they not follow such a good example? Why do they not cure the sick?
Why do they not relieve the families of honest people overwhelmed with misery? I answer, that one
does not know all the good done in secret. One must not do good and then publish it at the sound of
the trumpet; the left hand, according to the precept of our Saviour, Jesus Christ, must not know the
good which the right hand doeth. It was not known, until after the death of Flamel, who was the
author of these good works. The hieroglyphic figures, which he had placed in the Cemetery of the
Innocents, presented only that which was pious and in conformity with religion. He himself lived
humbly, without ostentation, and without giving the least sign of the secret which he possessed.
Moreover, there were in those times greater facilities for doing good than now.
Philosophers are not so common as physicians. They are few in number. They possess the secret of
curing all maladies. They are not lacking the desire to do good to all the world; but this world is so
perverse that it is dangerous for them to try it. They would do so, at the risk of their lives. Will they
cure some one as by miracle? A murmur will be heard among the Physicians and the People; and
even those who most doubted the existence of the Philosophical Remedy will then suspect that there
is such a thing. This man will be followed; his actions will be observed; the report will spread; the
avaricious, the ambitious will pursue him to discover his secret. Then, what can he hope for but
persecutions, or voluntary exile from his country?
"The experience of the Cosmopolite and of Philalethes proves this sufficiently. “We are,” says the
latter, “enveloped in malediction and infamy; we cannot enjoy tranquilly the society of our friends;
whosoever will discover who we are, will wish either to extort from us our secret, or to plan our ruin,
if we refuse to reveal it to them. The world today is so wicked and so perverse, interest and ambition
so dominate men that all their actions have no other aim but the satisfaction of these passions. Do we
wish, as the Apostles, to perform works of mercy, one returns to us evil for good. I have made the
trial of this lately in some distant places. I have cured, as by miracle, some dying ones, abandoned by
Physicians; and to escape persecution, I have been obliged, more than once, to change my name, my
dress, to shave my hair and my beard, and to flee under cover of the night.” Yet, to what greater
dangers would a Philosopher not expose himself, if he should make the transmutation? although he
should intend to make use of the gold for a very simple life, and for the benefit of those in need. This
gold, finer and more beautiful than common gold, as they say it is, will soon be recognized. By this
mark alone, one will suspect the bearer, perhaps even of counterfeiting money. What frightful
consequences would a Philosopher, charged with such a suspicion, not have to fear?"
A TREATISE
ON
The Great Art
Ironically, if they DID just get on and share it with everyone else then none of the above would be a problem. No need for anyone to be aggressive towards them if they just shared the Stone with everyone. It's a self-fulfilling outcome.
Selfishly keep it for oneself = a life of looking over your shoulder and possible death/murder if you are found out
Share with all humanity = end of human suffering and all rejoice because all are now equal. Live freely and happily with all.
If this secret is a gift of God, some will say it must doubtless be placed in the category of the talents
which God bestows and which must not be buried. If Philosophers are people so pious, so charitable,
why do we see so few good works on their part? A single one, Nicolas Flamel, in France, has built
and endowed churches and hospitals. These monuments exist today in the sight of all Paris. If there
are other Philosophers, why do they not follow such a good example? Why do they not cure the sick?
Why do they not relieve the families of honest people overwhelmed with misery? I answer, that one
does not know all the good done in secret. One must not do good and then publish it at the sound of
the trumpet; the left hand, according to the precept of our Saviour, Jesus Christ, must not know the
good which the right hand doeth. It was not known, until after the death of Flamel, who was the
author of these good works. The hieroglyphic figures, which he had placed in the Cemetery of the
Innocents, presented only that which was pious and in conformity with religion. He himself lived
humbly, without ostentation, and without giving the least sign of the secret which he possessed.
Moreover, there were in those times greater facilities for doing good than now.
Philosophers are not so common as physicians. They are few in number. They possess the secret of
curing all maladies. They are not lacking the desire to do good to all the world; but this world is so
perverse that it is dangerous for them to try it. They would do so, at the risk of their lives. Will they
cure some one as by miracle? A murmur will be heard among the Physicians and the People; and
even those who most doubted the existence of the Philosophical Remedy will then suspect that there
is such a thing. This man will be followed; his actions will be observed; the report will spread; the
avaricious, the ambitious will pursue him to discover his secret. Then, what can he hope for but
persecutions, or voluntary exile from his country?
"The experience of the Cosmopolite and of Philalethes proves this sufficiently. “We are,” says the
latter, “enveloped in malediction and infamy; we cannot enjoy tranquilly the society of our friends;
whosoever will discover who we are, will wish either to extort from us our secret, or to plan our ruin,
if we refuse to reveal it to them. The world today is so wicked and so perverse, interest and ambition
so dominate men that all their actions have no other aim but the satisfaction of these passions. Do we
wish, as the Apostles, to perform works of mercy, one returns to us evil for good. I have made the
trial of this lately in some distant places. I have cured, as by miracle, some dying ones, abandoned by
Physicians; and to escape persecution, I have been obliged, more than once, to change my name, my
dress, to shave my hair and my beard, and to flee under cover of the night.” Yet, to what greater
dangers would a Philosopher not expose himself, if he should make the transmutation? although he
should intend to make use of the gold for a very simple life, and for the benefit of those in need. This
gold, finer and more beautiful than common gold, as they say it is, will soon be recognized. By this
mark alone, one will suspect the bearer, perhaps even of counterfeiting money. What frightful
consequences would a Philosopher, charged with such a suspicion, not have to fear?"
A TREATISE
ON
The Great Art
Ironically, if they DID just get on and share it with everyone else then none of the above would be a problem. No need for anyone to be aggressive towards them if they just shared the Stone with everyone. It's a self-fulfilling outcome.
Selfishly keep it for oneself = a life of looking over your shoulder and possible death/murder if you are found out
Share with all humanity = end of human suffering and all rejoice because all are now equal. Live freely and happily with all.