- Joined
- Jun 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,349
Hi Jimmy
Yes, but remembering that there is more than one Mercury.

"Thus is accomplished the first part of the axiom: solve et coagula, by the constant
volatilization of the fixed and by its combination with the volatile; the body spiritualized itself
and the metallic soul, leaving behind its stained garment, takes on another, even more
precious, to which the ancient masters gave the name of philosophical mercury.
Yes, but remembering that there is more than one Mercury.
Yes.Finally he symbolizes with his two caducei, the mercury duplex, epithet that some
Adepts have substituted to that of philosophical mercury or common mercury, our living and
dissolving water" ~The Dwellings of the Philosophers, Fulcanelli.
You would need the complete Alchemic Process to advance into "Specifics"/ Particulars.Interesting so it sounds like you need the rebis or philosophical mercury if you want to specify to the metallic realm "common mercury" x1 will not take the soul of the metal.
Yes.Your answer helped me with another question regarding the universal nature of the work. i.e. clarity on whether metals are needed or not.
For transmutation sure it makes sense to specify to silver or gold.
Absolutely correct.Even if we do not intend to specify to metals the most appropriate test of our mercury is the gold test,
Yes.Seems like if you do this right you get a stone or powder for transmutation (particular, specified, signified but on the foundation of the universal) and a tincture for medicine (universal, unspecified, married to itself.)
From Black
"Universal Quintessence is Open to be Signified ... it is like a stem cell that can be directed for what the Alchemist wants of it."
Quintessence (Soul) is Living, it has a consciousness and can be imprinted upon for a specific outcome.Hence why it is called our living waters?