- Joined
- May 22, 2012
- Messages
- 688
Read the link in the previous page about the "burden of proof" and you will see that you are trying to reverse it to put the burden of proof on others who are not making any such "supernatural/paranormal" claims but demanding proof for them. This fallacy is called "argumentum ad ignorantiam".
Regarding proof of transmutation: the world will have it when I am ready to deliver it. Suffice it to say that anyone who has the patience, time and money to invest in investigating it will find it, that is for sure (unless the person in question is very dumb, lazy and/or inept.) I myself have found it (of course, it took many years of patient research and experimentation.) Since it does not require any supposed (and unproven) "supernatural/paranormal powers" anyone can do it. Yes, you can achieve it too. Even dev/Awani can. Anyone can.
I am not seeking to reverse burden of proof because I am not seeking to prove something of my own here. I simply and accurately observe that you regularly employ 'a priori' and then hit people over the head repeatedly with empiricism without correctly delineating the transition between the two. This is a sleight of hand and as I mention rather boorish.
As for waiting for you to deliver your findings I doubt they will ever be forthcoming and within the paradigm of empiricism I assume none will ever be forthcoming. I assume that you will not achieve anything until you prove otherwise as the empiricist paradigm requires. Also to be blunt I am far too busy to be waiting around for you to actualy come up with something concrete.
In the past despite your woeful lack of anything really practical or empirical JDP you have several times challenged me to produce practical empirical evidence. I will continue to regularly show my findings be they 'Alchemical or Spagyric' despite whomever chooses to sneer rather then test for themselves in the spirit of research.
Last edited: