- Jul 29, 2018
No-Thing is not a dual composite function, but an attribute used for linguistic convenience, given the obvious limitations of language.
1. "No-Thing" is used to convey that "it" is not a "thing".
2. "No-Thing" is also used to differentiate "it" from the absurd notion of "Nothing", the latter having no implicit or explicit reality, except maybe for "small talk". Literally, the is NO "Nothing".
I think I see what you're saying here. You're saying that ''No'' is literally ''Nothing'' not No-Thing but ''Nothing'', got ya.
''Thing'' is the ''Only'' reality. ''No'' is literally ''Nothing''.
Maybe you should re-read the Emerald Tablet. All "from" & "by" One Thing, by Adaptation.
''The father thereof is the Sun, the mother the Moon'' - Emerald Tablet
The Father and Mother of the One Thing.
Two parents as the cause for this One Thing forming through its adaptation.
Why does only One Thing have Two parents?
''And as all things were by contemplation of one, so all things arose from this one thing by a single act of adaptation.'' - Emerald Tablet
Adapting to what?
Any change of state, I'm thinking, is be cause of its dual or multiplicite composition. Infinity can be counted but without end, and Infinity is what this Thing is composed of, meaning ''Thing'' is composed of ''not just one'', would you agree?
One Thing in Alchemy, has a multiplicite composition, think of One Matter, and in One Matter as SOMEONE has mentioned in the past, has multiple things in its composition that ultimately FORM the One Thing. There was a tree branch example mentioned, how a tree branch is one thing, but in its composition, there are multiple things that make up One.
Think INFINITY, there's Infinite Expressions, but all of these can be reduced to number, and the first number can be reduced again to No-Thing and 1 and Infinity being born, think Emerald Tablet having its Father and Mother, through Adaptation, Think Passenger and Carrier, Subtle and Gross, the seemingly mirrored reflections of Two.
(By the way, this is the Emerald Tablet, so if you feel for a second that I might be data mining or trying to be ''sneaky'' or trying to get ''inside knowledge'' in any way here, do NOT reply or give me your viewpoints I do NOT need them, I am genuinely interested to see if my perspective is ''wrong'' here, I am sincerely investigating some things right now, which includes looking into Walter Russel and his supposed ''Absolute +'')
Don't feel like you gotta respond to this.