- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
- Messages
- 1,593
There is often a lot of alchemy in magical grimoires... but quite often the alchemical ideas of the magical grimoires are not very easy to be taken to a "Lab practice" in a literal way... and sometimes they don't even make sense in a strict alchemical context limited to "Lab practices".
i.e, I am thinking of the case of the "Treatise of the Reintegration of Beings" by Martinez de Pasqually : http://www.martinismeoperatifquebec.org/treatiseofreintegration.pdf (I know nothing about this Canadian Martinist Order, it's simply the first result that google gave me for the text).
I love his Treatise and it certainly has an alchemical vision of the Genesis and an alchemical vision of the mission of Man on earth. Saint-Martin followed the same ideas (he was one of the students of Pasqually) and also wrote extensively on the same subjects using exactly the same alchemical ideas.
I know Martinist Orders that do not practice at all any kind of "Lab Alchemy" and some others that do... However, I have NEVER seen any Martinist Order using the ALCHEMICAL ideas of Pasqually, Saint-Martin or Willermoz in a Lab...
i.e, I like the writer Demetrius Semelas and he has interesting texts on Martinism and interesting texts on Alchemy... The interesting thing of his texts on Alchemy is that they completely contradict the Alchemical ideas of Pasqually and Saint-Martin (I am unable to say if Semelas himself was a good alchemist or a bad alchemist, but that's not the point... for me the point is that when he wrote about Alchemy, he completely ignored the ideas of Pasqually... and probably it is because they don't really make a lot of sense when they are "translated" to a physical practice in the context of a Lab).
The ideas of Pasqually and his "alchemical genesis" are quite similar to the ideas of Ali Puli and his "alchemical genesis" (explained in the Centrum Naturae Concentratum)... I mean, there are obvious philosophical coincidences... but if you go to the details, at some given point, Pasqually doesn't make much sense in the context of a Lab.
I would even bet that someone who knows 10 different paths to make the Stone would be unable to make the Stone (at a Lab) strictly following the ideas of Pasqually without "cheating" (cheating = doing something that goes against the alchemical process he describes).
For the records, I really really like Pasqually and Saint-Martin... but I don't think their alchemical ideas have much value in the context of a Lab... and probably that's because they were not thinking about taking those ideas to a Lab and had other contexts in mind.
This is just an example, but I think the same thing is true for the vast majority of the Magical Grimoires.
i.e, I am thinking of the case of the "Treatise of the Reintegration of Beings" by Martinez de Pasqually : http://www.martinismeoperatifquebec.org/treatiseofreintegration.pdf (I know nothing about this Canadian Martinist Order, it's simply the first result that google gave me for the text).
I love his Treatise and it certainly has an alchemical vision of the Genesis and an alchemical vision of the mission of Man on earth. Saint-Martin followed the same ideas (he was one of the students of Pasqually) and also wrote extensively on the same subjects using exactly the same alchemical ideas.
I know Martinist Orders that do not practice at all any kind of "Lab Alchemy" and some others that do... However, I have NEVER seen any Martinist Order using the ALCHEMICAL ideas of Pasqually, Saint-Martin or Willermoz in a Lab...
i.e, I like the writer Demetrius Semelas and he has interesting texts on Martinism and interesting texts on Alchemy... The interesting thing of his texts on Alchemy is that they completely contradict the Alchemical ideas of Pasqually and Saint-Martin (I am unable to say if Semelas himself was a good alchemist or a bad alchemist, but that's not the point... for me the point is that when he wrote about Alchemy, he completely ignored the ideas of Pasqually... and probably it is because they don't really make a lot of sense when they are "translated" to a physical practice in the context of a Lab).
The ideas of Pasqually and his "alchemical genesis" are quite similar to the ideas of Ali Puli and his "alchemical genesis" (explained in the Centrum Naturae Concentratum)... I mean, there are obvious philosophical coincidences... but if you go to the details, at some given point, Pasqually doesn't make much sense in the context of a Lab.
I would even bet that someone who knows 10 different paths to make the Stone would be unable to make the Stone (at a Lab) strictly following the ideas of Pasqually without "cheating" (cheating = doing something that goes against the alchemical process he describes).
For the records, I really really like Pasqually and Saint-Martin... but I don't think their alchemical ideas have much value in the context of a Lab... and probably that's because they were not thinking about taking those ideas to a Lab and had other contexts in mind.
This is just an example, but I think the same thing is true for the vast majority of the Magical Grimoires.