• The migration to this new platform is complete, but there are a lot of details to sort out. If you find something that needs to be fixed make a post in this thread. Thank you for your patience!

. 2050

Krisztian

Occultum
Patron of the Arts
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
900
. . . the future is not fixed, it can be changed. We have to address the now rather then saying it will be OK because remote viewing shows the future in a certain way. . .

Something along the lines of what was said here in the above, New Scientist recently posted one of their analysis of four possible future environmental outcomes, http://www.newscientist.com/article...-of-environment-and-society.html#.UlAthyy9KSP projected date 2100.

I'm aware that if you ask one expert he'll say our planet is warming, and another, that we're entering a mini ice age. But figured, article somewhat fits this Thread.
 

III

Invenies
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
527
This particular Thread hasn't been active for a little while. Found this assertion by David Levy of University of Maastricht saying, that by the year of 2050, humans will have sex with artificial intelligences.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/10/15/forecast-sex-and-marriage-with-robots-by-2050/

Strange?

Normal?

Why not?


An eight year old Fox sex toys of the future story. Marriage with a sex toy seems like a corruption of marriage. I know that in marriage is a hot issue right now, but I there is a big difference between offering another human the perks of being a married human, such as tax benefits and offering that to a sex toy, even an AI sex toy.


Now lets get to the heart of it. What is SEX about. My view may be different because of my view of sex as a spiritual practice, that the importance comes from being in a spiritual rapport with another human who has had to be able to rid themselves from fears of perceiving the self and the other person.


I can't picture going into spiritual metaphysical rapport with a sex toy. If one reduces sex to the purely physical then some who are happy with the purely physical might find it enjoyable. But again to "marry" a TOY seems bizarre. If one is into joined and shared metaphysical experience as part of sex then I don't see how any toy can serve the purpose. A toy has no attached lineage. A toy isn't a metaphysical being, whether simulating intelligence or not.
 

black

Hermes Trismegistus
Patron of the Arts
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
1,349
I was playing around with remote viewing during my Academia years - I guess it's the byproduct of boredom and maybe curiosity - namely, Dr. Schwartz's Remote Viewing Gold Standard Course (DVD). I didn't realize at that time that one of his sessions entitled "2050" was actually a project of sort.

To cut to the point, I was able to view myself in 2050, to my great surprise. I was also very surprised 'to see' how humanity was developing, I mean, I saw places, communities, etc., covered with large trees, people lived under protection, or should I say, houses were integrated into Mother Nature. The building was organic, it also had consciousness in-bedded in it's fabric. People seemed happy. I also saw very 'strange' technology (that I couldn't understand after the session was over, when the analytical side clicked on). They had a sort of a large chair with what seemed as a satellite-dish behind the head. It was I assume a telepathic phone. It reminded me of a Plate from Book of Lambspring, the king sitting on his throne. I guess you sit on it, and you can dialogue directly with family members in other towns, it amplifies and focusses you. Humanity was dispersed. Less people alive.

Then, I saw platforms protruding out of treetops. They were platforms for 'airbus' (that moves by different propulsion energy, I don't know). The top had clear glass, darkened; the shape was that of a clothing-iron. It moved effortlessly. . . . To my surprise, some 5 years later, I saw, I believe in Popular Science one similar to it, they had a specific issue on 'transportations of the future'. It was almost identical.

I had a very,very long beard! And I was puzzled by the geographical location? Not until some years later when I relocated to my new home, did I, to my great chuckle, realized as I was stepping off the plane, that the mountains I remote viewed years prior in 2050 was now stretching all around me!

Does anyone want to share similar experiences? With remote view? Or, without it? I'm all ears, now that I just realized how long this posting is.

At 34 minutes into the video Lyn starts talking about his viewing of the year 2080.

 

microwatt

Rectificando
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
200
At 34 minutes into the video Lyn starts talking about his viewing of the year 2080.
its interesting to note that Al Bielek in his time travels noted that in the year 2137 the population was under 300 million for the world. I do not believe that tptb will allow any sort of etheric technologies to get on the market. War will always be on the civilization menu. Hope Im wrong.
 

Chiliasticus

Terrae
Hermetic Pilgrim
Joined
May 2, 2022
Messages
104
its interesting to note that Al Bielek in his time travels noted that in the year 2137 the population was under 300 million for the world. I do not believe that tptb will allow any sort of etheric technologies to get on the market. War will always be on the civilization menu. Hope Im wrong.

God bless this man. I been to the base multiple times. Not a fun place. Montauk goes deep.